Quantcast Periscope
College Media Network

Current Issue:

Brooke's Chapel should be restored for performance quality

Zachary Smith

Issue date: 11/17/08 Section: Opinions and Editorials
  • Print
  • Email
In 1982, Brookes Chapel underwent a "major renovation," as Dick Taylor, assistant VP for facilities, called it. Before this renovation, Brookes' acoustics were much more musical than now.

For its renovation, Shorter's then-current president asked for "no echo," according to Peter DeWitt. For a musical performance venue to have "no echo" is not the most helpful, but Shorter's administration had planned since 1978 to build a new performance hall to compliment the new Minor Fine Arts building.

So, when Brookes Chapel was renovated to its current state in 1982, there was the understanding that a place would be built to replace Brookes's function as a performance hall.

However, as often unfortunately happens when expanding, money ran out before all plans could be carried out. Thus, the plan for a new performance hall was dropped, and Brookes has continued to serve as Shorter's only performance venue, despite the fact that its acoustics are the exact opposite of what a performance venue's should be.

It is my opinion that, as no performance hall was nor probably will be built, Brookes' acoustics should be restored to a musical state.

There are three things that should be changed: the acoustical ceiling, the furniture and the carpet. However, my petition is only that the carpet should be taken up, and a hard, flat floor be installed. I even concede the section of carpet running down the aisle between the two pew rows, if that must be left.

But to do any less than what I request should truly be impermissible. Shorter's School of the Arts has a great faculty, but its facilities need a little help in Brookes' acoustics.

So, what exactly are the acoustics of a given place? Acoustics are what gives each place its own treatment to the sounds produced there. Hard, flat surfaces reflect more sound, whereas soft, porous surfaces absorb sound.

These places are said to be more resonant, or 'wet'. An example of a 'dry' place with very little resonance is a closet crammed with so much sound-absorbing clothing that you could clap and the sound be immediately lost.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

What is your favorite sport?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement